So, complexity, strategies and enjoyment of games
It is very popular in modern gaming to look up optimal strategies for games.
There are some obvious reasons for it. Major one being why bother trying to learn how to play stuff on your own and trying to catch up with everybody else the hard way, especially if it's a competitive game? That's pretty much like reinventing the wheel. It just makes sense.
I also hate it.
For me, a big part of the enjoyment of games is figuring them out. I don't mind being somewhat ineffective or less than optimal, if it means I got to that point myself. Sometimes this leads to me discovering strategies on my own and then later finding out they are considered the best (mostly the other way around though).
But why do I hate it then? Surely I can live (ignorantly) in peace and leave it be.
Yeah, no.
If I am playing a highly competitive game like Starcraft, if I am matched against an opponent who looks up and tries to adhere completely to an optimal strategy, while I am in my own Homo erectus phase and I am figuring out fire, such a game is 9/10 times not going to end well for me.
So essentially I put myself at an disadvantage by using this approach.
But I don't want to change it. If a game is complicated enough and the average player is expected to know the optimal strategy (like Starcraft), I will just have to accept the fact that either I will too, or I'll keep losing. Sadly, for me both of these options have the same ending: I stop playing the game.
For me, the day I have figured out a game is one of the last days I am playing the game.
There are some obvious reasons for it. Major one being why bother trying to learn how to play stuff on your own and trying to catch up with everybody else the hard way, especially if it's a competitive game? That's pretty much like reinventing the wheel. It just makes sense.
I also hate it.
For me, a big part of the enjoyment of games is figuring them out. I don't mind being somewhat ineffective or less than optimal, if it means I got to that point myself. Sometimes this leads to me discovering strategies on my own and then later finding out they are considered the best (mostly the other way around though).
But why do I hate it then? Surely I can live (ignorantly) in peace and leave it be.
Yeah, no.
If I am playing a highly competitive game like Starcraft, if I am matched against an opponent who looks up and tries to adhere completely to an optimal strategy, while I am in my own Homo erectus phase and I am figuring out fire, such a game is 9/10 times not going to end well for me.
So essentially I put myself at an disadvantage by using this approach.
But I don't want to change it. If a game is complicated enough and the average player is expected to know the optimal strategy (like Starcraft), I will just have to accept the fact that either I will too, or I'll keep losing. Sadly, for me both of these options have the same ending: I stop playing the game.
For me, the day I have figured out a game is one of the last days I am playing the game.
Comments
Post a Comment